<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Badmouth &#187; nature</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.badmouth.net/tag/nature/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.badmouth.net</link>
	<description>Look, Ma! No pants!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 18:04:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Earth</title>
		<link>http://www.badmouth.net/earth-2007/</link>
		<comments>http://www.badmouth.net/earth-2007/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 19:01:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brian McDonough</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Columns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movie Review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[documentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nature]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badmouth.net/?p=1151</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<img src="http://www.badmouth.net/content/uploads/2009/04/earth-polar-02-330x218.jpg" alt="earth" title="earth" width="330" height="218" class="aligncenter size-thumbnail wp-image-1155" />
<strong>[rating:3]</strong>
<strong>Directors: Alastair Fothergill, Mark Linfield</strong>
<strong>Starring: Lions, Elephants &#038; Polar Bears, oh my!</strong>

Here’s a fact:  If you’re going to make a documentary called <i>Earth</i> and fit it into a ninety-minute run time, you are doomed to failure.  Big topic, “Earth.” Even if you’re sticking to the natural world, and even if your main goal were to fetishize waterfalls and cute baby animals, you’re still never gonna produce a ninety-minute film worthy of being called … <i>Earth</i>.

The first film to be released by the new DisneyNature label (timed to Earth Day!) is in fact a two-year-old BBC-funded documentary that was produced in parallel with <i>Planet Earth</i>, a series whose total ten-hour runtime sounds a little better-suited to covering the subject.  Knowing this somehow makes one more forgiving of the flaws of the cinematic release. <i>Earth</i> feels like a poorly assembled hodgepodge of brilliant footage whose glory is nearly lost beneath weak storytelling (and a truly crap score).  Imagining the filmmakers having to cut the 600 broadcast minutes they’d already culled from thousands of hours of video to get this hour and a half at least makes you appreciate how stacked against them the deck was.
No related posts.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.badmouth.net/earth-2007/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

